Standards
Editorial Policy
WagerInk exists to give content teams at licensed gambling brands research they can rely on. These rules apply to every page we publish.
Accuracy
- Rules come from the regulator, statute or code itself; search guidance comes from the platform's own documentation.
- Quotes are copied exactly and dated. Paraphrase is never put in quotation marks; translations are marked as such.
- Every page shows when its sources were checked, separately from when it was published or updated.
- When we cannot verify something on an official source, we say so or leave it out.
Samples and data
Examples marked "Sample" use invented brands, pages and figures to illustrate a method. We do not present samples as findings. We publish benchmark or performance figures only from studies that meet our benchmark methodology, and so far none has been published.
Independence
We do not accept payment to publish, change or remove content, and we do not sell links. We never write in exchange for links. The publisher's commercial interests are described on our disclosure page.
AI use
We use AI tools to help find sources, summarize documents for the editor and draft text. The editor checks every fact, quote and date against the original and is accountable for the published page. We do not use AI-generated author photos, names or credentials.
Corrections
Report errors to hello@wagerink.online. We aim to review reports within five working days. Corrections are noted at the end of the page with a date, and the updated date changes when content changes substantially.
Review cycle
Compliance briefs are rechecked at least quarterly and whenever a rule changes. Guides and methods are rechecked at least every six months. More about our process is on the methodology page.